MASTERS
CANDIDATE
Ms Foo Ern Hui, Serene
A Timespace Critique of Singapore, the “Good” Global City
Existing academic literature on global
cities tend to be founded upon a space/time dualism. Geographical accounts
in particular take a predominantly spatial perspective that leave a necessarily
coimplicated temporal dimension severed from the analysis.
As such, this thesis contributes to existing global cities scholarship by
extending literature on time and timespace through and to research on global
cities. Focusing on the Singapore River area, my research explores how different
aspects of time are being (re)produced, consumed/ experienced, and resisted by
the public and private sectors and by locals and thus adopts a timespace critique
to evaluate Singapore’s utopian aspirations to be a “good” global city for Singaporeans.
Specifically, this thesis focuses on three conceptualisations of time. First, I
surface how the naturalized imperative to follow a “global city” developmental
trajectory underpins Singapore’s justification for continuous rapid urban change
and the effects on heritage and national identity. I then elaborate on the resistances
strategies undertaken by the private sector and locals. Just as space encapsulates a
social dimension, time is also socially experienced in the everyday.
As such, the second aim of this thesis is to study time as a social everyday
experience. I study the governance, self-governance, effects and resistance of a
fast pace of life in Singapore. Third, in this neoliberal global city, time is not
just experienced but socio-temporal experiences are reconfigured as commodity and
capital for monetary exchange and capital accumulation.
Therefore, I explore the spatial reification of different speeds though the formation
of temporary and permanent fast spaces and slow spaces and their contribution to a
neoliberal global city utopia, the role of private sector resistances to allow for the
creation of these spaces and evaluate how these influence the development and experience
of Singapore as a “good” and liveable global city.
|