About the Speaker:
Brian Rappert is an Associate Professor of Science, Technology and Public Affairs in the Department of Sociology and Philosophy at the University of Exeter. His long term interest has been the examination of how choices can and are made about the adoption and regulation of security-related technologies; this particularly in conditions of uncertainty and disagreement.  His book Controlling the Weapons of War: Politics, Persuasion, and the Prohibition of Inhumanity (Routledge, 2006) is an attempt to ask how humanitarian and ethical limits are set on war.  Biotechnology, Security and the Search for Limits: An Inquiry into Research and Methods (Palgrave, 2007) considers the prospects and problems with introducing security-inspired controls to prevent the destructive use of biotechnology research.  Other books from 2007 include A Web of Prevention (Earthscan, co-edited with Caitriona McLeish) and Technology and Security (Palgrave, edited

 

bio

 

 

Promoting ‘Ethics Talk’ about Research: Lessons from Engagements with Bioscientists

by

Dr. Brian Rappert
Associate Professor of Science, Technology and Public Affairs
Department of Sociology and Philosophy,
University of Exeter

Date:

3pm, 12th September 2008

Location:

AS7, Level 6
(The Shaw Foundation Building)


Research Clusters Meeting Room A

Abstract:

In recent years, the relation between national security and science research has been a topic that has received considerable attention.  As part of this, questions are being raised by national scientific academies, international science organizations, and security agencies regarding whether the knowledge and techniques generated through fundamental and applied life science research might facilitate the production of bioweapons.  Consideration of the so-called ‘dual use’ potential of life science knowledge and techniques is itself part of growing concern about biosecurity.  This has resulted in debate regarding whether controls should be placed on what gets done, how, and whether information is widely circulated.  Arguably this sort of discussion challenges many of the traditional presumptions of biologists and others regarding the implications of their research and its proper governance.

This presentation elaborates the methods employed in and findings of some 100 seminars with 2500+ practicing scientists and students in 12 countries about dual use issues.  There have been two aims to these focus group style seminars: one, to inform participants about current ‘biosecurity’ debates and second, to generate interactive discussion about the merits of proposed policy responses.  My presentation will recount some of the interactions in the seminars with a view to considering the tensions and lessons associated with efforts to promote responsive life science and social research.

 

 
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences: Home | Search | Site Map | Contact Us
© Copyright 2001-04 National University of Singapore. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy | Copyright | Non-discrimination | Disclaimer
Last modified on 9 September, 2008 by FASS Webmaster